![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Concepts and strategies for biorefineries in Europe 30th March 2009 was the date for BioreFuture 2009, the second annual European biorefinery workshop. It was hosted by two EU-funded projects, Biorefinery Euroview (http://www.biorefinery-euroview.eu) and Biopol (http://www.biorefinery.nl/biopol) at the Committee of the Regions in Brussels. More than 100 participants attended from 15 countries, representing industry, government and academia. The objectives of the workshop were the following:
Please find below the programme, presentations and report of the event:
Workshop summary report: The workshop began with introductions from the coordinators of the two projects, Dr. Bert Annevelink (Wageningen UR, Netherlands) from Biopol, and Christophe Luguel (Industries & Agro-Resources Cluster, France). A welcome address was also given by Dr. Piero Venturi of the European Commission’s DG RTD, the scientific officer for the two projects. ‘Defining biorefineries and different concepts’ ‘Mapping EU biorefinery activities & the consumer landscape’ The results showed some important trends. Most biorefinery developments are occurring in Western European countries and many are co-located with chemical and biofuels industry developments, as well as agro-industries, pulp & paper and forestry industries. ‘Whole crop’, ‘multiple feed’, ‘green’ and 'lignocellulosic' biorefineries are popular ventures so far, and they generally take advantage of locations with existing local bio-industry, local R&D facilities, local feedstock supply or local transport hubs. Periodic updating of the mapping overview in order to monitor the evolution of biorefineries in Europe is recommended. Furthermore it is recommended to analyse barriers and potential solutions for the development of biorefineries in Eastern EU countries. Key success factors for the establishment of biorefineries can usefully be identified from the mapping and can assist the design of policies to foster European biorefinery developments. Prof. Klaus Menrad (FH Weihenstephan, Germany) presented results from a survey of consumers who were asked about their attitudes towards bio-based products. With consumer chemicals representing as much as 10% of EU chemical sales, he stressed that consumers could play a critical role in providing markets for biorefinery products. The results indicate that European consumers are very positive towards the biorefinery concept, but possess a low level of knowledge of policy targets in Europe, such as those for biofuels or bio-based products. Nevertheless, the respondents were generally positive towards the prospect of products such bio-based shampoos and detergents, and many would be willing to pay a premium, albeit a small one. This work suggests a role for consumer products to be strong sources of revenue for biorefineries, but raises questions about how such products can be reliably labelled in order to enable consumers to make well-informed choices. ‘Technical Descriptions & Prospects for Further Demonstrations’ Koen Meesters (Wageningen UR, Netherlands) presented his investigation of the establishment potential and costs of pilot and demo scale biorefineries. By synthesising a range of project results presented he outlined some implications regarding the appropriate technologies for different European regions. Western, and to a lesser extent Southern Europe have good establishment factors for all types of biorefineries (productive agricultural land providing raw materials and oil refineries, chemical industry and cattle to sell the side products). In Eastern Europe these were lower, but since agricultural yields are expected to increase then their potential suitability for future biorefineries will improve. Northern Europe is promising for wood-based processes. Lignocellulosic biorefineries are not considered ready for full scale implementation yet, but considerable technological improvement is expected. Syngas biorefineries are more ready, but have very high investment costs. Overall, demonstration and establishment of biorefineries will depend on consumer, industrial and political acceptance, raw material availability and viable side-product markets, as well as technical and economical feasibility. ‘Policy Recommendations and a Discussion of Priorities for Europe’ The policy recommendations were followed by interventions from invited speakers from Canada and the European Commission. Maria Wellisch (Natural Resources Canada) gave a highly informative talk about activities in Canada in the context of other initiatives in the US, Europe and elsewhere. Canada, she said, has a vast resource to be tapped, but new developments are often attempts to reinvent the forestry industry, rather than arising from sustainability ambitions. Consequently, the drivers in North America are different to those underpinning many of the European efforts, but are nevertheless accelerating innovation in the field. Dr Alfredo Aguilar (European Commission DG RTD) placed the project work in the context of the EU’s Knowledge-Based Bio-Economy (KBBE) agenda. He expressed his confidence that the new information presented at the workshop would help guide the large investments being made in research by the EU. These 4 presenters were then joined for a panel discussion by Wijnand Schonewille (Port of Rotterdam, Netherlands), Dr. Christian Patermann (ex-European Commission and now advisor to North Rhine Westphalia, Germany), Rene van Ree (Co-chair of the European Biofuels Technology Platform) and moderator Dr. Ausilio Bauen (Imperial College London, UK). The lively discussion raised a number of crucial points for biorefinery development: new markets need to be created for bio-based products through policy actions; Europe should initiate dialogues on the subjects of resource-use prioritisation and genetic engineering; the advantages of biorefining need to be clarified and communicated; and opportunities should be sought for linking new processes into existing infrastructure in order to reduce the costs of establishment. Concluding remarks
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||